News
12April2018
Pepeliaev Group secures top ratings in The Legal 500
Law Firm Pepeliaev Group has continued to perform positively at the top of The Legal 500 international ratings.
05April2018
Pepeliaev Group has been appointed as legal counsel to retailer Kingfisher (owner of the Castorama brand) in Russia
Pepeliaev Group has been chosen as one of the Russian legal advisers to British retailer Kingfisher plc. In Russia the company operates through Castorama DIY and home improvement stores. Our lawyers will provide legal advice to the client on the following key areas of expertise: corporate and commercial law; and real estate.
30March2018
Stay in touch with Pepeliaev Group
Please be advised that our telephone and fax numbers have been changed
12March2018
Pepeliaev Group has made significant strides up the Chambers Europe rankings: new practice areas have featured in prominent positions in the top bands of the rankings.
Pepeliaev Group has made striking progress in the Chambers Europe 2018 rankings. In Restructuring/Insolvency: Litigation Pepeliaev Group has risen to Band 3 skipping one band as compared with the last year’s results. In addition, Yulia Litovtseva, Partner and Head of the Bankruptcy and Anti-Crisis Protection of Business Practice, has shown an improvement of her own, rising to Band 4 in individual rankings.
07March2018
The lawyers of Pepeliaev Group’s customs practice protected the client’s interests before the Economic Panel of the Russian Supreme Court
The lawyers of Pepeliaev Group’s customs practice won the case for the client, a major shipping company, before the Economic Panel of the Russian Supreme Court.
05March2018
Pepeliaev Group’s lawyers represented a client in the Russian Intellectual Property Court (the “IP Court”): the legal protection of a similar trademark owned by a bad-faith rightholder was declared invalid.
The firm’s lawyers successfully represented Kavminvody JSC (“Kavminvody”), a renowned producer of the Novoterskaya Tselebnaya mineral water, in the IP Court. The outcome was that the legal protection of a similar trademark owned by a bad-faith rightholder was declared invalid.